Queens Fish Bar 4:46 Tue Nov 26
January transfer window
|
|
When does the pointless speculation on here kick off?
***Please use this thread for transfer speculation***
http://www.westhamonline.net/forum_flat.php?9414498||1||
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Queens Fish Bar
8:03 Thu Jan 9
Re: January transfer window
|
With the ongoing hamstring worries with Antonio, it makes sense to recall Grady Diangana from West Brom.
|
D.B Cooper
12:33 Thu Jan 9
Re: January transfer window
|
I wouldn’t sign Randolph as he is currently injured. Does this club never learn?
|
Exiled In Surrey
12:20 Thu Jan 9
Re: January transfer window
|
Not paying the full amount for Randolph (if he is passed fit). Boro owe West Ham, haven't paid full original transfer fee.
|
Block
6:23 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
Coffee, in this particular instance it's cunt.
|
goose
6:21 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
no he plays for Bournemouth.
|
Coffee
6:20 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
What's the word for a young goose? Is it a gosling?
|
Block
6:13 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
All about opinions, young goosey.
4 million for a good goal keeper is peanuts.
|
goose
5:58 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
Actually no you are:
Martin isn’t an adequate #2, hence why we’re buying a new one.
For £4m, which isn’t peanuts given our budgets.
|
Block
5:53 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
You're not being clear, you're trying to suggest I've said things about the two players when I haven't.
As usual, you're talking utter bollocks.
|
goose
5:48 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
i'm being very clear about it.
they are buying Randolph to be the #2 and £4m is not insignificant in the context of our budgets.
|
Block
5:38 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
Yes, I said he was an adequate number 2, so what? Doesn't mean because the board are spending 4 million on another keeper means I'm saying Randolph won't be number 2, is it?
You're all over the place, making shit up and suggesting i've said things when I haven't.
Silly cunt
|
goose
5:35 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
"martin is a more than adequate number 2"
he's not that is why we are spending £4m on another goalkeeper. £4m is a fair amount in the context of our budgets. its about 25% of what we spent in the summer.
that is the point.
ritardato.
|
Block
5:31 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
Now you're making stuff up?
Well done.
I never said anything about Randolph being a number 2 or 3, or whether he was coming in as either.
The point was that we had 3 keepers and they're looking to offload Roberto because he is dog shit and spending £4 million on a player like Randolph who's a decent keeper is next to nothing in this day and age.
You're off your rocker, son.
|
goose
5:28 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
the bit where i said why would you spend £4m on a 3rd choice keeper and you said it was 'peanuts'.
so you agree he is coming in as #2 then?
so therefore you agree that Martin will be #3.
thought so.
idiota.
|
Block
5:25 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
Go back to where I actually said he wasn't coming in as number 2?
|
goose
5:18 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
mega lols at your lack of self awareness.
the entire world knows we have very little money to spend. why on earth would we waste £4m on a 3rd choice keeper?
Randolph is coming in as #2 and literally everybody but you realises that.
|
Admiral Lard
5:14 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
Ben Stokes in as reserve Keeper
|
Block
5:14 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
£4m is peanuts in today's game, for a player like Randolph it makes complete sense, it's called having a decent squad.
Fucking hell, you're just arguing for the sake of it now.
|
goose
5:10 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
why would you spend £4m on a 3rd choice keeper stupido?
|
Block
5:07 Tue Jan 7
Re: January transfer window
|
goose = jack sullivan
|
| 
